{"id":350,"date":"2020-05-08T10:36:55","date_gmt":"2020-05-08T14:36:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/?page_id=350"},"modified":"2020-05-11T18:23:17","modified_gmt":"2020-05-11T22:23:17","slug":"disturbance-calcs","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/disturbance-calcs\/","title":{"rendered":"Human Impact and Environmental Analysis Models"},"content":{"rendered":"

Park planners, environmentalists, and more utilize different models to analyze the amount of human impacts in regions both quantitatively and qualitatively.<\/p>\n

Example method 1<\/h6>\n

Looking at various greenhouse gases to analyze the impact of traveling tourists. Variables are listed on the leftmost column, and how they are measured is in the second from the left.<\/p>\n

\"\"
List of variables being analyzed (Aamir, 1954)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"\"
Analysis Results (Aamir, 1959)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Example Method 2<\/h6>\n

Analysis based on the amount of human disturbance using a human disturbance index. The following tables lay out the “metabolic state” (extent of urbanization) as well as their descriptions that was measured.<\/p>\n

\"\"\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Areas of analysis (Insostroza, 2076-2078)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"
Qualified chart of terminology and ideas (Insostroza, 2075)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Depending on the different types of analysis, the results can end up being drastically different.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"
Undisturbed areas based on different models (Insostroza, 2081)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"\"
Human disturbances based on different models (Insostroza, 2079)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Further Readings<\/h5>\n

Aamir, Alamzeb, Elsherbini Elashkar, Elsayed, Imran Qureshi, Muhammad, Mohamd Shoukry, Alaa, Nik Mahmood, Nik Hasnaa, Rasli, Amran Md., and Zaman, Khalid. \u201cMeasuring the ecological footprint of inbound and outbound tourists: evidence from a panel of 35 countries,\u201d Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy<\/em>, no. 21 (2019): 1949-1967.<\/p>\n

Inostroza, Luis, K\u00f6nig, Hannes J., and Zasada, Ingo. \u201cLast of the wild revisited: assessing <\/em>spatial <\/em>patterns of human impact on landscapes in Southern Patagonia, Chile.\u201d Reg. Environ <\/em>Change (2016): 2071-2085.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Park planners, environmentalists, and more utilize different models to analyze the amount of human impacts […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1899,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-350","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1899"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=350"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/350\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":797,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/350\/revisions\/797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/patagonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}