{"id":2336,"date":"2023-09-28T16:23:52","date_gmt":"2023-09-28T20:23:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/?p=2336"},"modified":"2023-09-28T16:25:25","modified_gmt":"2023-09-28T20:25:25","slug":"the-us-department-of-states-latest-report-on-afghan-siv-processing-finds-bidens-program-expansion-falling-short-among-growing-backlog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/the-us-department-of-states-latest-report-on-afghan-siv-processing-finds-bidens-program-expansion-falling-short-among-growing-backlog\/","title":{"rendered":"US Department of State report on Afghan SIV processing finds Biden&#8217;s program expansion insufficient, among growing backlog"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last month marked two years since President Joe Biden withdrew American troops from Afghanistan takeover of the nation by the Taliban. According to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/US-Withdrawal-from-Afghanistan.pdf\">Biden Administration<\/a>, 70,000 Afghans were evacuated by the U.S. military in August. In addition, The Biden Administration added staffing and expanded the budget of the for the Special Immigrant Visa program that relocates Afghans who aided American soldiers and diplomats in\u00a0 Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>However, a recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stateoig.gov\/uploads\/report\/report_pdf_file\/aud-mero-23-23.pdf\">report<\/a> released by the US Department of State reveals that these reforms have fallen disastrously short.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The report found that efforts to improve the SIV process in anticipation of the Afghan withdrawal began in February 2021 &#8211; in addition to the expanded staff, email processing software was employed, and a new consular was established in Doha, Qatar,. These improvements, however, were no match for the influx of SIV applicants that followed the fall of Kabul in August 2021. &#8220;The number of Afghan SIV principal applicants awaiting COM approval increased by 1,416 percent from October 2021 through December 2022, from 4,029 to 61,114, respectively,\u201d the report notes. Applications were spiking as the Taliban crackdown intensified in Afghanistan, but there were no additional personnel hired to deal with this increase in applications after February. As of August 1st, 2023, nearly 35,000 SIVs had been issued &#8211; but more than an estimated 152,000 SIV-eligible applicants remain <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/interactive\/2023\/afghanistan-allies-stuck-visas\/\">stuck<\/a> in Afghanistan or otherwise in limbo waiting for their visa to be processed.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Belonging to the latter group is Muhammad Idrees Ghairat, a scholar at the SPIA Afghan Policy Lab at Princeton University and an Afghan refugee. Ghairat, a former employee of the United States Institue of Peace in Kabul, applied for his SIV in April 2021 &#8211; four months before the US withdrawal. In May, he was given a case number and asked to submit a supervisor letter of recommendation, but he did not receive any further updates on his case. On August 15, 2021, when Kabul fell, Ghairat was among the 70,000 immediately evacuated, aided by the fact that he had a case number in hand\u2014but he still did not have a visa. In December of 2022, after arriving in the US, he found out via the online SIV portal that he had been denied for an SIV because his recommendation letter was \u201cnot verifiable.\u201d \u201cMy supervisor stopped working for the US Institute of Peace when Kabul fell,\u201d he explained. \u201cWhen they contacted her by email, it was to an email that is now not working.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ghairat has appealed the decision, but it has been pending for more than 8 months. In the interim, he is in the US on humanitarian parole, a visa that only allows you to be here for two years. His parents and disabled sister are still stuck in Afghanistan. \u201cYou don\u2019t know what\u2019s next, or what\u2019s happening,\u201d Ghairat says. \u201cThe Taliban are threatening family members. The emotional and psychological stress &#8211; my family has insurance but no access to healthcare in the Taliban government. It is very frustrating.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Despite these circumstances, Ghairat is hopeful about his future. \u201cI am still confident in my case because my office is still functioning; my employers know me personally. They can send in any verification evidence that the process requires. But what if you don\u2019t have a direct supervisor or if you are a subcontractor?\u201d he asks.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ghairat strikes at a crucial point. \u201cThe Afghan immigrant visa process is incredibly layered,\u201d says Jenna Jaffe, Congressional Immigration Specialist. \u201cI have yet to see a program category with a higher threshold to meet &#8211; and you must meet every criterion 100%.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jaffe explains that after an SIV application is submitted, the most significant hurdle is clearing the first step: obtaining Chief of Mission (COM) approval. COM approval is the Department of State\u2019s process of applicant employment verification and letter of recommendation review. Ghairat is currently awaiting COM approval as well.\u00a0 \u201c60% of applications get stalled or do not pass this phase, and in many cases, not because of any fault of the applicant,\u201d Jaffe says.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jaffe gives the examples that it is not always possible to get a letter of recommendation from an applicant\u2019s supervisor. \u201cI\u2019ve worked on cases where the applicant&#8217;s supervisor has passed away. What then? You would think the government would keep a list of its contractors &#8211; they don\u2019t, or they won\u2019t share it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The COM approval is part of the \u201cenhanced vetting\u201d process touted by elected officials and even the secretary of Homeland Security as a way to stop \u201cbad actors\u201d from entering the country. \u201cBut there is no data to support that enhanced vetting is catching any bad actors.\u201d Jaffe says, \u201cFor example, many of our security systems are not built for non-European names, whether in spelling, length, or naming conventions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jaffe explains that there are many ways that there could be multile acceptable transliterations of the same Arabic name &#8211; \u201cbut if there is an inconsistency in our\u00a0 system, the applicant is denied.\u201d Jaffe says that enhanced vetting doesn\u2019t really work, and ultimately, it only makes life impossible for both Americans and Afghans.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Looking forward, the Department of State\u2019s report outlines plans to hire a hundred additional personnel to support SIV processing. They estimate that this has the potential to allow the government to process all the applications currently stalled in the COM phase within the next three to five years.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jaffe appreciates any extra help but does not see a way forward in this system long-term without greater reform. \u201cThe Department of Homeland Security needs to be meaningfully restructured,\u201d she says. \u201cThe government has no vested interest in people understanding the immigration system, and the vast majority of the public points their anger and fury at people who have nothing rather than at Congress for failing to create a functional immigration system.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last month marked two years since President Joe Biden withdrew American troops from Afghanistan takeover of the nation by the Taliban. According to the Biden Administration, 70,000 Afghans were evacuated by the U.S. military in August. In addition, The Biden Administration added staffing and expanded the budget of the for the Special Immigrant Visa program<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/the-us-department-of-states-latest-report-on-afghan-siv-processing-finds-bidens-program-expansion-falling-short-among-growing-backlog\/\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4220,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4220"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2336"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2341,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2336\/revisions\/2341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/migrationreporting\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}