{"id":3315,"date":"2018-07-12T09:52:17","date_gmt":"2018-06-28T18:03:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/analysis\/"},"modified":"2019-08-22T09:15:16","modified_gmt":"2019-08-22T14:15:16","slug":"analysis","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-530 size-full\" style=\"margin-left: 50px;\" src=\"http:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2018\/07\/Saturation.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"427\" height=\"276\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-529\" src=\"http:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2018\/07\/ElectromagnetGraph.tif_.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"750\" height=\"504\" \/><\/p>\n<h4>Data Analysis &#8211; Theoretical Comparison<\/h4>\n<p>The experimental data (exp 8 &#8211; 14) shows an exponential shape before saturating and leveling off. This can be compared to the a theoretical saturation of both wrought and cast iron in the figure above. As shown, the material Henry used was somewhere between The value of H for Henry&#8217;s data depends on the amount of current drawn from the galvanic cell, which depends on a currently unknown value of internal resistance. However, we estimate the resistance of his single galvanic cell to be fairly high, somewhere around 5 ohms. The first 4 points on the graph are offset from the fit line, showing the diminishing loss of magnetic flux density due to the leakage of magnetic force lines.<\/p>\n<p>(The Electrical Engineer, Vol.11 (July 1893): pp.95,173)<\/p>\n<p>The following MATLAB syntax was used to construct this comparison.<\/p>\n<p>hold on<\/p>\n<p>H1=[0,1.66,4,5,6.5,8.5,12,17,28.5,50,105,200,350,660].\/(4.*pi.\/10);%Magnetomotive force in ampere-turns<br \/>\nB1=[0,5000,9000,10000,11000,12000,13000,14000,15000,16000,17000,18000,19000,20000].*(.0001); %Flux Density is Tesla<br \/>\nF1=(((2.*(B1.^2).*(4.*(.0254.^2))).\/(2.*u0))).*0.224808943; %Force in Pounds<br \/>\np1=plot(H1,F1,&#8217;-&#8216;);<\/p>\n<p>H2=[0,5,10,21.5,42,80,127,188,292].\/(4.*pi.\/10);<br \/>\nB2=[0,4000,5000,6000,7000,8000,9000,10000,11000].*(.0001);<br \/>\nF2=(((2.*(B2.^2).*(4.*(.0254.^2))).\/(2.*u0))).*0.224808943;<br \/>\np2=plot(H2,F2,&#8217;&#8211;&#8216;);<\/p>\n<p>coils=[0,1,2,2,3,4,6,9]; %Data from Joseph Henry&#8217;s Paper<br \/>\nweight=[0,7,145,200,300,500,570,650];<\/p>\n<p>d=.045*(.0254); %Diameter of the wire used in meters<br \/>\nA=pi*(d\/2)^2; %Cross sectional area of the wire used<br \/>\nL_c=60*12*(.0254); %Length of wire used in each coil in meters<br \/>\nro=1.68*10^-8; %Resistivity in ohm-m<br \/>\nR_L=ro*L_c\/A; %Resistance of each coil<br \/>\nR_S=5; %Resistance of the galvanic cell, assuming the batteries<br \/>\n%he used had fairly high resistance compared to modern batteries.<br \/>\nR=R_L+R_S; %Total Resistance of Circuit<br \/>\nI=(1\/(R)); %Current in each coil<br \/>\nN=coils.*80; %Number of turns<br \/>\nH=((I.*N)); %Magnetomotive force in ampere-turns<\/p>\n<p>p3=plot(H,weight,&#8217;o&#8217;)<br \/>\nxlabel(&#8216;H (Ampere-Turns)&#8217;)<br \/>\nylabel(&#8216;Weight (lb)&#8217;)<\/p>\n<p>legend([p1,p2,p3],&#8217;Wrought Iron&#8217;,&#8217;Cast Iron&#8217;,&#8217;Henrys Experiment&#8217;,1)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Data Analysis &#8211; Theoretical Comparison The experimental data (exp 8 &#8211; 14) shows an exponential shape before saturating and leveling off. This can be compared to the a theoretical saturation of both wrought and cast iron in the figure above. As shown, the material Henry used was somewhere between The value of H for Henry&#8217;s &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/analysis\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Analysis&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3315","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3315"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3797,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3315\/revisions\/3797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/josephhenry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}