{"id":1642,"date":"2019-05-14T16:52:30","date_gmt":"2019-05-14T20:52:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics\/?p=1642"},"modified":"2019-05-14T16:52:30","modified_gmt":"2019-05-14T20:52:30","slug":"media-analysis-results-of-tx-23","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/media-analysis-results-of-tx-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Media Analysis Results of TX-23"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Slide 1: Predicted Results<\/b><\/p>\n

This slide shows predicted results of how different factors influence immigration coverage by the media based on previous research. Branton and Dunaway\u2019s \u201cSpatial Proximity to the US-Mexico Border and Newspaper Coverage of Immigration Issues\u201d say that closer proximity to the US-Mexico border increases negative immigration coverage. This would apply more to local levels of media. Since TX-23 shares a large portion of the border with Mexico, it is more likely that coverage of immigration will be primarily negative. This article also states that high Latino populations increase negative media. TX-23 is 70% Latino. This will increase negative coverage as well. Hopkins\u2019 piece \u201cExplaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition\u201d argues that a higher salience of immigration in the news. Based on this, it can be predicted, whether on a local or national level, that if there is a greater quantity of immigration coverage, it is more likely to be negative. Abrajano and Hajnal suggest in <\/span>White Backlash <\/span><\/i>that there are significant correlations between the Republican Party and higher levels of negative immigration media. TX-23 is about 48% Republican, so some local coverage on immigration will be negative, but not all of it. It will most likely correlate with the party identification of the district. These predictions, however, may not be entirely accurate. TX-23 is known as being a swing district with a moderate representative who does not focus on immigration, so all predictions may not be accurate.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Slide 2: Data Used to Test Predictions <\/b>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The two news sources I compared were The Alpine Avalanche and Fox News. The Alpine Avalanche is one of the largest local newspapers in TX-23. Fox News is a prominent national news source that is known for being very conservative. The articles tracked were from December 11, 2018 to January 31, 2019 during the government shutdown over border wall funding debates. The code words used to narrow down these articles were \u201cBorder,\u201d \u201cwall,\u201d \u201cimmigrant,\u201d \u201cundocumented,\u201d \u201cimmigration,\u201d \u201cshutdown,\u201d \u201cLatino,\u201d \u201cHispanic,\u201d \u201cMexico,\u201d \u201cillegal immigrant,\u201d and \u201cillegal immigration.\u201d These factors helped narrow down the search results to determine what portions of the articles involved immigration discussion. By comparing a local news source and a national news source, it will help test if the previous predictors are applicable to local media, national media, or both.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Slide 3: Results<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This slide depicts two graphs which show the results of tested code words, one for The Alpine Avalanche and the other for Fox News. The graphs show which code word was searched, how many articles that code word appeared in, and what percentage this represented of the total numbers of articles. There were 73 articles published by The Alpine Avalanche between December 11, 2018 and January 31, 2019. Out of these articles, very few of them involved immigration-related topics. Many of the code words overlapped in the same few articles. The articles which did appear with these code words were very neutral and objective. Some were right-leaning or made a point of referencing immigration related to drugs in a negative way, but it was overwhelmingly neutral. The highest percentage of immigration-related articles was with the word \u201cborder\u201d at 5.5%. Between these dates, Fox News published a total of 11,133 articles. In comparison to The Alpine Avalanche, Fox News had a much higher concentration of immigration-related stories, all of which were negative towards the subject. Similarly to The Alpine Avalanche, Fox News\u2019s most popular code word was also \u201cborder\u201d which represented 19.8% of the total articles. They are very different levels of news coverage, so these numbers do have to be interpreted differently because of the great difference of numbers in the total articles published. Regardless, Fox News, at a national level, had a much higher level of code words used in comparison to a newspaper at a local level. <\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Slide 4: Conclusions <\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

One of the major differences between the articles in The Alpine Avalanche and Fox News were the way immigration-related topics and border wall issues were presented. The Alpine Avalanche presented neutral articles which showed both sides of the debated issues. Fox News showed these topics in a very negative light. Based on the results, not all of the previous predictions were accurate when applied to a national news sources and a local news source in TX-23. Proximity to the border and Latino populations were not an accurate predictor here. TX-23\u2019s close proximity to the border did not increase negative immigration coverage because The Alpine Avalanche\u2019s articles were not negative. Since Fox News is a national news outlet, the idea of proximity is not applicable. The high Latino populations in TX-23 also did not increase negative media as predicted. However, predictions of salience and Republican Party connections were accurate. Local media had little immigration coverage, so articles were not negative. Fox News, on the other hand, had a high salience of immigration-related coverage, and it was, as predicted, negative. In addition, TX-23 consists of about 48% Republican voters. Articles were not immensely negative, though some did lean right depending on the code word. Fox News\u2019 readers and viewers are almost entirely Republican, so nearly all related articles were anti-immigrant. The fact that only half of these predictors were accurate shows the differences between local and national media coverage. These differences may be, as mentioned in slide 1, because TX-23 is a unique district itself. So, even though predictions based on prior research may be accurate most of the time, it is possible that TX-23\u2019s unique characteristics, as well as the polarized state of 2019 has shifted the expected results.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Slide 1: Predicted Results This slide shows predicted results of how different factors influence immigration coverage by the media based on previous research. Branton and Dunaway\u2019s \u201cSpatial Proximity to the US-Mexico Border and Newspaper Coverage of Immigration Issues\u201d say that closer proximity to the US-Mexico border increases negative immigration coverage. This would apply more to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1078,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1642","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-districts-3","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1642","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1078"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1642"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1642\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1654,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1642\/revisions\/1654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/immigrationpolitics-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}