{"id":149,"date":"2021-09-29T11:14:22","date_gmt":"2021-09-29T15:14:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/?p=149"},"modified":"2021-09-29T11:14:22","modified_gmt":"2021-09-29T15:14:22","slug":"additional-week-4-1-2-thoughts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/2021\/09\/29\/additional-week-4-1-2-thoughts\/","title":{"rendered":"Additional week 4 1\/2 thoughts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>We raised a complex of issues, from Hazal and Joyce and others, about <i>access<\/i> as a central question\u00a0for the definition\u00a0of disciplines and their relations. Who gets in\u2014to the schools, programs, rooms, journals, etc.\u2014and who\u00a0does not. How does leading with that question change how we look at the landscape as it exists, and as it might? What do a discipline&#8217;s relations with the wider world have to do with its relations to other disciplines? Etc. As we begin to look toward collaborative work for the exhibition, perhaps this is a promising concept.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Another (raised esp. by Utku) had to do with the risk that in putting certain\u00a0kinds of knowledge on the other side of a rough humanities\u00a0\/ sciences divide, we limit our capacity to understand our own situation, especially\u00a0in terms of the economics and labor politics that shape the university.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Let me reprise the distinctions that we drew in order to fill out the problem of &#8220;knowledge production&#8221; as a paradigm for humanistic work: sciences on the left, humanities on the right (social sciences where?):<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div>\n<p>objectivity\u2014subjectivity<br \/>\ninformation\u2014interpretation\/critical thinking<br \/>\ncollaboration\u2014autonomy<br \/>\nreproducibility\u2014singularity<br \/>\nfor profit, for social good\u2014for itself, for social good<br \/>\nfact\u2014value<br \/>\ninstrumental\/unreflective\u2014ethical\/reflective<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>How workable are these distinctions; how much are they an imaginary, and specifically, the humanities&#8217; imaginary? And if the humanities <i>are<\/i> understood to have a distinctive power to think every question as a test of its premises (in contrast with &#8220;normal science,&#8221; in <a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/thomas-kuhn\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/thomas-kuhn\/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1633014682245000&amp;usg=AFQjCNE2XKFvewOeqJ6ZqJZjQYwRiuof9Q\">Thomas Kuhn<\/a>&#8216;s phrase), how well do we\u00a0 live up to that?<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>I ask these questions partly to frame Utku&#8217;s. Partly also to wonder how questions of access fall in that division or whether they lead us toward other frameworks.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We raised a complex of issues, from Hazal and Joyce and others, about access as a central question\u00a0for the definition\u00a0of disciplines and their relations. Who gets in\u2014to the schools, programs, rooms, journals, etc.\u2014and who\u00a0does not. How does leading with that question change how we look at the landscape as it exists, and as it might? &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/2021\/09\/29\/additional-week-4-1-2-thoughts\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Additional week 4 1\/2 thoughts&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":379,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/379"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":150,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149\/revisions\/150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/hum583-f21\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}