{"id":49,"date":"2024-11-13T20:32:13","date_gmt":"2024-11-13T20:32:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/?page_id=49"},"modified":"2024-12-13T12:53:35","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T12:53:35","slug":"project-6","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/projects\/project-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Anthony"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The Filmmaker&#8217;s Influence Over Identity<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>ABSTRACT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>My interests are attuned to the construction of stories and narratives that tend to proclaim or make arguments through specific uses of popular plot lines, editing, statistics, data structures and scene structures. These visual elements are a part of creating invisible motivations, contexts, or even calls to action that enable filmmakers to portray and implement their own video choices in order to speak towards a specific audience. This can also support the ways in which specific identities are represented across film\u2014 the main part of my project. These relationships between the filmmaker and the motivations behind specific editing, plots or scenes are able to show the invisible relationships between identity of characters\/subjects and the way filmmakers portray those identities. Furthermore, I incorporate statistics that relate to identity.\u00a0 These statistics or data structures can portray and manipulate the way identities are portrayed, in relation to film.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>INTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Identity as a concept is very nuanced and complex. Throughout class discussions we have time and time again, seen how filmmakers translate identity. Whether this be through the meticulous usage of metaphors, editing styles or the reclamation of voice. We have mainly discussed how Indigenous communities use filmmaking to reclaim the narratives that western filmmakers have created about them. In examining the way filmmaking has impacted the narratives of Indigenous communities, I wanted to explore the way filmmaking has an influence or power to create and shape identity. Specifically, shape the way audiences perceive identity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>SCHOLARLY OVERVIEW<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Faye Ginsburg in \u201cThe Parallax Effect: The Impact of Aboriginal Media on Ethnographic Film,\u201d applies the term parallax [a term used in astronomy] to a more universal usage of filmmaking. Parallax is described as: \u201cthe apparent displacement of the difference in apparent direction of an object as seen from two different points.\u201d (64) To further this explanation, Ginsburg describes the way one creates a parallax effect through cinematic perspectives. In which she states:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf harnessed analytically, these \u2018slightly different angles of vision\u2019 can offer a fuller comprehension of complexity of the social phenomenon we call culture and those media representations that self consciously engage with it.\u201d (65)<\/p>\n<p>Parallax allows cultural representations to be built from different points of view. Film representations only take small parts or emphasize specific areas of identity that won\u2019t fully encompass identities holistically. The idea here is that by taking multiple perspectives and views as a way of using parallax, one is able to construct a more accurate representation of the identity that one encompasses. Applying this to the discussions we have explored surrounding film and identity, I would like to offer an analysis of the ways in which filmmakers create personalities, characters, stereotypes and shape the identity of human beings and communities. By analyzing films and data representations through the lens of parallax, we can understand the ways in which filmmakers have made technical, plot and metaphorical choices to represent identities and create structured arguments. This is important because filmmaking and statistics create and form identities, which have a large impact on the way audiences understand communities and cultures. Additionally, in light of the way western filmmaking and Indigenous filmmaking differ [highlighting two different voices and perspectives,] parallax can offer an important understanding of; the addition of more perspectives, create a bigger picture\u2014 an overlap of multiple perspectives. The creation of a pluriverse, in Arturo Escobar\u2019s words.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>IMAGINING INDIANS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Let us first examine Imagining Indians (1992), a film about the ways Hollywood cinema has misrepresented Indigenous and Native American culture. This film takes multiple interviews of Indigenous actors and their experiences on sets, in order to show the way Indigenous people have been misrepresented. In particular, closely examining the stereotypes of Native American people within films and their roles in films. I wanted to closely highlight the filmmaker, Victor Masayeva, and his film style. Particularly the loud metaphorical usage of dentistry or a doctor to reveal the ways in which Indigenous people are silenced by western pressures of representation.<\/p>\n<p>The three minute clip featured in figure 1, can be described as a narration of how sacredness has become less sacred in the Indigenous perspective due to filmmaking. The narrator emphasizes the participatory aspect of Indigenous cultural practice and the way that it is difficult to transmit this through film. Additionally the narrator describes how the preservation of language and the necessity of language helps keep things sacred. The simplification of language for wider audiences has made cultural practices less sacred. The narration ends with, \u201cto be able to be part of a spiritual community that knows\u2013\u201d and is cut off by the sawing noise that a tooth drill creates.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 676px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-49-1\" width=\"676\" height=\"378\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Imagining-Indians.mp4?_=1\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Imagining-Indians.mp4\">https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Imagining-Indians.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p>Figure 1. <em>Imagining Indians, <\/em>(31:00)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Throughout the film the usage of a dentistry scene is shown in between the various narrations and interviews that help construct the film\u2019s argument: that Native Americans have been misrepresented in films. The patient is Indigenous while her dentist is a white man. Scenes usually focus on the subdued patient as a weak individual where she is unable to speak and comment on the words of the dentist. This metaphor is representative of the way western culture has described Indigenous communities without listening to their perspectives.<\/p>\n<p>Returning to figure 1, the dentist\u2019s drill interrupts the narration and creates a blunt cut between the narration of sacredness and the dentist performing treatment on the patient. The blunt cut juxtaposes the variety of fade in\/fade out transitions between previous clips that move in between cultural practice and nature. In figure 2, I provide a snapshot of the cuts made between nature (V3), cultural practices (V2), animals (V1), and dentistry scenes (V4). The importance of these cuts implements the significance of Indigenous values. Almost like the filmmaker decided to layer the clips in a variety of fade in\/fade out cuts that represent Indigenous values, in order to emphasize &#8220;sacredness.&#8221; The clips in V4, represent the interruption for how sacredness and community are undermined by western perspectives. Instead, the dentistry scene returns the narrative of Indigenous people to the dentist\u2014 or the western power. But why use a dentist as a metaphor for western power and perspective?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-3.00.26-AM-300x195.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 2.\u00a0<em>Imagining Indians. (31:00)\u00a0<\/em>The cuts within the scene sequence.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I would like to implement the ways in which parallax in this instance [a filmmaker making comments from an Indigenous perspective about the way they are portrayed in film] can reveal larger systems at play. In Paul Farmer\u2019s article, \u201cAn Anthropology of Structural Violence,\u201d Farmer analyzes Haiti as a primary example of the ways systems of slavery, poor economic policies and history have led to the tangible effects of poor health status, poverty and social inequality. In this way context is important to the underlying invisible structural violence. Structural violence is the way in which social and economic structures can impact and perpetuate poor living conditions: inequality, illness, poverty, etc. Parallax views these conditions or impacts from larger systems and a point of view that considers these systems as part of the problem.<\/p>\n<p>Dentistry within Imagining Indians, may be not only a metaphor to the ways in which western perspectives subdue Indigenous perspectives. But, also reveals larger issues of structural violence relating to the way these representations have led to inequality and stereotyping of Indigenous communities. Healthcare is the best way to target and metaphorically reveal structural violence, as healthcare accessibility in many Indigenous communities is a very big issue. Figure 3 is representative of a chart showing the percentage of every population that is uninsured within the state of New Mexico. New Mexico in particular has a high Indigenous population. Even so, the other states\u2019 visualizations on the website show how Indigenous populations within the U.S. are either always the first or second most uninsured populations. These graphs are not representative of the structural violence or invisible structures that cause these things, but it does show how Indigenous communities do not have health insurance. Figure 4, represents a chart that shows the factors that lead to poor health including the invisible structures that led to what is the center most bubble for poor cardio metabolic health. It is important to show how parallax can create smaller more center views of charts such as figure 3, or larger views that include structures and systems as seen in figure 4.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-4.12.29-AM-300x189.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 3. New Mexico population rates of those uninsured separated into categories of race. (UCLA)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-4.18.14-AM-300x224.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 4. Shows larger issues that surround cardio metabolic health in Indigenous communities. (Gurven et al.)<\/p>\n<p>Relating this to the metaphor within Imagining Indians, the data presented is representative of structures and systems affecting the health of Indigenous communities. Many have tried to combat these problems, but the interconnectedness of multiple factors for health in Indigenous communities are found to be closely tied to culture. This can be shown by figure 5. In this way, the filmmaking considers the ways structures of Hollywood have affected Indigenous culture. Which is closely related to the metaphor of patients being subdued. And the respective patient who is Indigenous and doctor who is white, can be a call to the structural violence that leads to adverse health effects or a painting of Indigenous communities that represent cultural customs as something exotic.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-5.20.28-AM-300x283.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 5. Structural systems that make up Indigenous culture. Interconnectedness of all aspects to fuel cultural identity. (Harfield, S.G., Davy, C., McArthur, A.\u00a0et al.)<\/p>\n<p>The parasitic relationship that western ideology and perspective has with respect to Indigenous perspective is very apparent in the way figure 5 represents culture. Culture is built on the pillars that surround it, and if one breaks so does the cultural structure in the middle. Stereotypes, healthcare, poverty are all parts of the structural violence that dissipates cultural practice and ideals. Victor Masayesva, filmmaker of Imagining Indians, and writer of, \u201cThe Emerging Native American Aesthetics in Film and Video,\u201d discusses the way in which; \u201cThe current crop of commercial films and television programs on Indians purportedly from the Native American\u2019s perspective is a half life \u2014 for in essence, they were by and for Whitemen.\u201d (Masayesva, 156) Additionally, Masayesva implores the need for a discovery of aesthetics and mediums that will convey \u201chuman redemption.\u201d Masayesva even questions film as an appropriate medium to handle the fragility and importance of Indigenous culture. This is important because of how identity and structural violence can be revealed through new film aesthetics and perspectives. And also show how film styles are important to the dissemination of culture. Masayesva emphasizes human redemption because of the ways \u201cHollywood\u201d films \u201cindoctrinate\u201d and misrepresent humans. The aesthetics Masayesva calls for are cultural, and the understanding of the relational aspects of life. In this sense, Masayesva promotes the importance of recognizing relationships in order to redeem human identities for those that have been misrepresented by Hollywood films. Let us continue to see how films are able to manipulate identity and cultural practice.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>WHO KILLED VINCENT CHIN?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In revisiting parallax and structural violence, \u201cWho Killed Vincent Chin,\u201d [by Christine Choy and Renee Tajima-Pena] is a film that shows the ways in which a specific perspective can reveal larger structural systems. But editing styles are important to the arguments and revelations made by the film.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWho Killed Vincent Chin,\u201d is a recount of the ways Vincent Chin, an Asian American Male, was brutally murdered by a father-son duo, in which it was then seen as a hate crime. This act of violence led to a public outcry to stop violence against the Asian community. But more than that, it became an outrage for achieving justice for Chin, as his murderers were not found guilty for his murder despite countless testimonies. The film itself is a testament to the racist systems that allowed the murderers to get away with murder.<\/p>\n<p>I would like to speak about particular instances in which the filmmakers decided to juxtapose scenes between Lily Chin, Vincent\u2019s mother, and one of the murderers, Ronald Ebens. There are many instances where their emotional states are placed next to one another in regard to scene order. Figure 6, Figure 7, and Figure 8 are the original clips in which Lily Chen\u2019s reactions and emotions in response to Vincent Chen\u2019s death and lack of justice are saddening. The desperate cries of a mother are then juxtaposed directly with clips of Ebens expressing his uncomfort in jail [the one night he had to spend in jail because he killed someone] and his reaffirming that the justice system did no wrong. These clips are purposefully set up to paint Ebens as uncaring and ignorant. Furthermore, it is revealing of the identities that Lily Chin advocates and cares for her son\u2019s life, while Ebens dismisses and finds the system works for him. Not only is this a testament to the way structural violence is revealed within the film, but it is representative of the way an argument can be constructed by the careful curation of clips in sequence.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 676px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-49-2\" width=\"676\" height=\"507\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand.mp4?_=2\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand.mp4\">https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p>Figure 6.\u00a0<em>Who Killed Vincent Chin? (36:25)<\/em><\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 676px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-49-3\" width=\"676\" height=\"506\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand-1.mp4?_=3\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand-1.mp4\">https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand-1.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p>Figure 7. <em>Who Killed Vincent Chin? (1:17:03)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 676px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-49-4\" width=\"676\" height=\"507\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand-2.mp4?_=4\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand-2.mp4\">https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Video-On-Demand-2.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p>Figure 8. <em>Who Killed Vincent Chin? (27:26)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I would like to offer a clip I put together of Eben\u2019s interviews back to back and see how this perspective changes the ways in which we may view Ebens, essentially using parallax to empathize with Ebens (figure 9.) Without the perspective of Lily Chin we have nothing to juxtapose, and it becomes a story of Eben\u2019s experience in jail and his prevail of ultimately not being sent to prison. The identity given to him by the original filmmakers shifts from ignorant and uncaring to someone that is scared and prevailing. This exercise changes the way in which filmmaking can be used to create identities and shape a person\u2019s characteristics. Additionally, there can be a prevention of the way structural violence is disseminated and revealed as the newly edited interviews of Ebens are unable to show structural violence. Rather, the new scene sequence makes the once visible structural violences and converts it into invisible ones.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 676px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-49-5\" width=\"676\" height=\"506\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/WHO-KILLED-VINCENT-CHIN-EBENS-.mp4?_=5\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/WHO-KILLED-VINCENT-CHIN-EBENS-.mp4\">https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/WHO-KILLED-VINCENT-CHIN-EBENS-.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p>Figure 9. Combination of Eben&#8217;s Interviews edited together<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>LLANTHUPI MUNAKUY<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The idea of structural violence being revealed through the different views and perspectives manipulated through film are important parts to the filmmaker\u2019s argument. But what about plots? Plots are another method of giving rise to arguments especially in regard to using popular structural plots that are recognized across media.<\/p>\n<p>In, Llanthupi Munakuy (Loving Each Other in the Shadows), by Marcelina Cardenas the plot line of \u201cThe Starcrossed Lovers,\u201d is used to portray cultural ideology of the spirit and body, and the importance of these forces. Star crossed lovers is a plot we see in a variety of films and literature, one most iconic being Romeo and Juliet. By interacting with this plot there is some kind of process that is done in which Cardenas Indiginzes the plot to emphasize the cultural practices of Quechua culture.<\/p>\n<p>The story follows a young couple Rosita and Juancito. Rosita is born into a very traditional family, in which her parents disapprove of her relations with Juancito. Describing him as a farm boy. The classic star crossed lovers trope, utilizes the hierarchical structure of the rich and poor (figure 10, 11.)\u00a0 The couple runs away and when Rosita wants to resupply on her needs she revisits home. Her father mistakes her for a criminal breaking in and kills her. Rosita\u2019s soul travels to Juancito in an attempt to get him to join her as they are in love. Juancito is told by a spiritualist that he needs to release her soul because it&#8217;s dangerous for her soul to be away from her body (figure 12.) As she is driven by love and will attempt to get him to join her on the other side. The film ends with Juancito releasing her soul.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-6.06.31-AM-300x226.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 10. Llanthupi Munakuy (12:52)<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-6.07.11-AM-300x231.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 11. Llanthupi Munakuy (13:13)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/427\/2024\/12\/Screen-Shot-2024-12-13-at-6.08.29-AM-300x228.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Figure 12. Llanthupi Munakuy (41:08)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>While the plot is rather grim, the indigenization of the plot is what really matters. Cardenas implements a way of incorporating the disapproving parents portraying the very traditional roles of Quechuan parents. Similarly, the entire ending in regard to the spirit-body relationship innately is indicative of the indigenization of the film. So why is this important?<\/p>\n<p>I want to revisit Masayesva\u2019s imperative goals of utilizing indigenous aesthetics in media to reiterate the ways Hollywood media has altered Indigenous representation. Cardenas\u2019 usage of Indigenous culture and implementation of Indigenous characters, ideas, etc into a very common plot used across media is indicative of the ways self determination can be done through media. In a sense the use of a popular plot almost elevates and places the film in comparison to other star crossed lover work. And by indigenizing the plot, there is a change in the Hollywood structure that Masayesva describes to be indoctrination. Rather it is a reclamation of the ways Indigenous culture has been misrepresented and sold in misrepresentation. And instead a telling of the ways Indigenous culture can be represented well in popular culture. And while it may not be as sacred as the real in person experience, it is closer to the sacredness that we discussed earlier when referencing Imagining Indians.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The idea of Parallax is very dimensional here. In a sense you are using a common \u201chollywoodized\u201d plot such as the star crossed lovers to view Indigenous culture, but then this opens to a perspective of self determinism. Really pushing against the grain that identity can only be labeled by the Hollywood media. The perspective one is viewing from is through a Hollywood lens. This is different from the other views we have observed as the editing of perspectives in Who Killed Vincent Chin? Showed how Ebens in a parallax view could&#8217;ve been viewed as a survivor of jail. Whereas here, the parallax view uses a lens, so we are viewing through another view to reveal something else about identity.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONCLUSION<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Parallax is a very helpful framework presented by Faye Ginsburg in which we are able to use it to understand the ways in which filmmakers incorporate their editing styles, metaphors and plots to create views. The reconfiguration of these choices would ultimately create another view in which we would be able to understand another perspective to an identity. With this understanding that the slightest change in stylistic choice can enable and create new stereotypes, create smaller scopes and withhold truthful information; it is imperative that filmmakers understand the consequences of their stylistic decisions. The relationship between filmmakers and their audience is far more related than I once originally thought. In fact, the filmmaker&#8217;s power to reveal identities, mediate identity conflicts, and misrepresent\/represent identities is significant to the relational ideas of how we construct our world. But, it is also important that the audience attempts to understand identities outside of the film world. Masayesva recognizes filmmaking limits, and in this understands that seeing the real world, creates a larger understanding [but again, parallax can build on this bigger understanding.] Ultimately, the concept of parallax in relation to filmmaking can reveal the personable identity, structural identity, and community identity.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<br \/>\nWork Cited\u00a0<br \/>\nMasayesva, Victor, Jr. \u201cThe Emerging Native American Aesthetics in Film and Video.\u201d Landscape(s).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Parallax Effect: The Impact of Aboriginal Media on Ethnographic Film\u201d (Ginsburg, 1995)<\/p>\n<p>Farmer, Paul. \u201cAn Anthropology of Structural Violence.\u201d Current Anthropology, vol. 45, no. 3, June 2004, pp. 305\u2013325.<\/p>\n<p>Who Killed Vincent Chin?. Choy, Christin &amp; Tajima, Renee. 1987.<\/p>\n<p>Imagining Indians. Masayesva Jr, Victor, 1992.<\/p>\n<p>Llanthupi Munakuy (Loving Each Other in the Shadows), Cardenas, Marcelina. 2001<\/p>\n<p>Harfield, S.G., Davy, C., McArthur, A.\u00a0et al.\u00a0Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: a systematic scoping review.\u00a0Global Health\u00a014, 12 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12992-018-0332-2<\/p>\n<p>Gurven, Michael, et al. \u201cHealth Disparities Among Indigenous Peoples: Exploring the Roles of Evolutionary and Developmental Mismatch on Cardiometabolic Health.\u201d Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 53, no. Volume 53, 2024, Oct. 2024, pp. 55\u201373. www.annualreviews.org, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-anthro-041222-101445\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-anthro-041222-101445<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Social Determinants of Health Dashboard for Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders By State | UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. <a href=\"https:\/\/healthpolicy.ucla.edu\/our-work\/nhpi-data-policy-lab\/data-dashboards\/social-determinants-health-dashboard-native-hawaiians-and-pacific-islanders-state?language=en\">https:\/\/healthpolicy.ucla.edu\/our-work\/nhpi-data-policy-lab\/data-dashboards\/social-determinants-health-dashboard-native-hawaiians-and-pacific-islanders-state?language=en<\/a>. Accessed 13 Dec. 2024.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Filmmaker&#8217;s Influence Over Identity &nbsp; ABSTRACT My interests are attuned to the construction of stories and narratives that tend to proclaim or make arguments through specific uses of popular plot lines, editing, statistics, data structures and scene structures. These visual elements are a part of creating invisible motivations, contexts, or even calls to action<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/projects\/project-6\/\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":142,"featured_media":0,"parent":10,"menu_order":6,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-49","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/49","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/142"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/49\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":463,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/49\/revisions\/463"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.princeton.edu\/ant252-f24\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}